"In
the past few years, Kaiser has cut patient stays
and placed
other limits on patient services," said CNA
Executive Director Rose Ann
DeMoro. "These documents demonstrate that Kaiser is seeking to
intimidate doctors who defy the trend and put the needs of their
patients ahead of Kaiser’s market goals. With the new compensation
program, these conscientious doctors may also pay a heavy financial
penalty.Kaiser’s new physician compensation program was
adopted by the
TPMG (The Permanente Medical Group) Board of Directors in November. It
divides pay into "core" and "variable" pay. "Variable" pay, up to 30%
of an individual practitioner’s compensation, will be based on
performance, much of it undefined, including not just the individual
doctor’s work, but the work of new physician teams.
While
specifics remain vague in public
statements by
Kaiser,
minutes of a TPMG Board meeting September 4, 1996 include a cost
analysis of TPMG activity co-authored by TPMG Executive Director Harry
Caulfield, MD.
In
the report, Caulfield claims studies that
show
Kaiser pays a
"higher cost per unit" for physician visits with patients than other
medical groups. Caulfield cites goals of increasing patient loads for
each physician, and says that to meet projected "cost reductions and to
generate new funds for new projects, savings from the physician payroll
are required."
DeMoro
noted that the discharge and pharmacy
reports
echo other
areas in which doctors are increasingly monitored for providing patient
care services. These include time spent with patients, the ordering of
blood and other laboratory work, respiratory and physical therapy, and
diagnostic tests. For example, the number of tests ordered, such as
MRI, X-Ray, and CT scans, are now also recorded per physician alongside
with departmental averages. "Computer
refinements have made the scrutiny
more
precise, and
Kaiser’s drive to maximize profits at the expense of care makes this
screening especially ominous," DeMoro said.
"This
is a disgraceful performance by a
corporate
giant that
spent $60 million a year in advertising just in 1995 proclaiming a
supposed ‘Commitment to Quality’ and that Kaiser is somehow ‘Different
from the Ground Up’ compared to the other giant corporate medical
chains in the health care industry," DeMoro added.
Kaiser’s
pressure on physicians also comes at a
time
when it is
making even greater concessionary demands on its Registered Nurses.
Half the RNs in Northern California Kaiser are being asked to give 15%
of their wages back to Kaiser, as well as to accept huge reductions in
medical and retirement benefits, time off, and employment rights for
the most experienced nurses, said Costello.
Kaiser
is also seeking to tie nurse bonuses to
cost
reductions.
"This proposal says to us make a choice -- patients’ advocate or
corporate partner. Any demands that a nurse or doctor put the company’s
performance ahead of the patient’s need is morally repugnant," Costello
said.
Yet Kaiser
made over $2 billion in profits in
the
three most
recent years for which data is available, gave its chief officer David
Lawrence a 12% pay hike in 1995, and spent an additional $96 million in
1995 on consulting fees.